Justice · outcomes
What happens after the challan
Eight convictions against twenty-five acquittals is not a statistic to hide in an annex. Each acquittal has a cause, and every cause is something the platform is built to prevent.
Convictions
Jan–May 20268
Acquittals
Jan–May 202625
Arrests
Jan–May 2026520
Conviction rate on challaned cases
derived24.2%
Derived from the two public-record figures above — not a separate published number.
Acquittal root cause
why cases fail at trialExtraction tool validation record missing2
Witness not produced or resiled2
Chain-of-custody gap in digital exhibits2
Statutory procedure not followed2
Territorial jurisdiction contested2
Attribution to natural person not proven2
The taxonomy is local, not a national standard — adopting one is gap G25. Even so, the pattern holds: the failures are evidential discipline, not investigative reach.
Hearing calendar
next up| Case | Court | Kind | Countdown | Witnesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3142 | Peshawar | Arguments | recorded | 5 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3106 | Islamabad | Framing of charge | recorded | 4 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3148 | Special Court Karachi | Evidence | adjourned | 0 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3109 | Special Court Karachi | Evidence | reserved | 4 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3118 | Peshawar | Witness examination | adjourned | 0 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3117 | Sessions Court Lahore | Evidence | adjourned | 3 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3112 | Sessions Court Lahore | Arguments | reserved | 4 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3120 | Special Court Karachi | Judgment reserved | recorded | 1 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3114 | Sessions Court Lahore | Framing of charge | reserved | 4 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3129 | Peshawar | Judgment reserved | reserved | 1 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3150 | Special Court Rawalpindi | Witness examination | ··:·· | 2 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3144 | Special Court Rawalpindi | Witness examination | ··:·· | 0 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3115 | Special Court Karachi | Witness examination | ··:·· | 2 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3150 | Sessions Court Lahore | Framing of charge | ··:·· | 5 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3102 | Special Court Karachi | Framing of charge | ··:·· | 1 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3127 | Special Court Rawalpindi | Arguments | ··:·· | 1 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3126 | Sessions Court Lahore | Arguments | ··:·· | 5 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3102 | Peshawar | Judgment reserved | ··:·· | 5 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3111 | Special Court Karachi | Evidence | ··:·· | 2 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3126 | Islamabad | Arguments | ··:·· | 6 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3121 | Peshawar | Witness examination | ··:·· | 3 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3120 | Peshawar | Witness examination | ··:·· | 6 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3114 | Special Court Karachi | Judgment reserved | ··:·· | 2 |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3122 | Sessions Court Lahore | Judgment reserved | ··:·· | 3 |
Judgment feed
recent acquittals with cause| Case | Court | When | Cause | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3134 | Special Court Karachi | 2026-10-15 | TOOL-VALIDATION | No validation record for handset family in evidence. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3112 | Sessions Court Lahore | 2026-10-12 | WITNESS | Two witnesses did not appear; one retracted. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3107 | Special Court Rawalpindi | 2026-10-11 | EVD-CUSTODY | Seal log inconsistent across two transfers. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3134 | District Court Peshawar | 2026-09-24 | PROCEDURE | Preservation notice served without recorded authority. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3108 | District Court Peshawar | 2026-09-01 | TOOL-VALIDATION | No validation record for handset family in evidence. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3150 | Special Court Karachi | 2026-08-14 | JURISDICTION | Offence partly committed outside territorial limits. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3128 | Special Court Rawalpindi | 2026-07-08 | JURISDICTION | Offence partly committed outside territorial limits. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3141 | Special Court Rawalpindi | 2026-06-23 | IDENTITY | Identifier linkage stopped at device, not person. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3142 | District Court Peshawar | 2026-04-25 | EVD-CUSTODY | Seal log inconsistent across two transfers. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3106 | Special Court (Cyber Crime) Islamabad | 2026-03-20 | PROCEDURE | Preservation notice served without recorded authority. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3133 | Sessions Court Lahore | 2026-02-26 | WITNESS | Two witnesses did not appear; one retracted. |
| NCCIA/CC/2026/3107 | Special Court Rawalpindi | 2026-01-29 | IDENTITY | Identifier linkage stopped at device, not person. |
The loop back into the platform
an acquittal is a requirementCustody gap → ECS weight. The heaviest acquittal cause becomes the heaviest checklist weight. A case cannot reach the challan gate with a broken chain of custody.
Validation gap → lab gate. An exhibit carried by a tool with no validation record is flagged at the exhibit level, before the package is built.
Attribution gap → human only. Where attribution stopped at a device, the platform does not extend it to a person. That decision stays with an investigator and a court.